Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Enable highlighting results

Merged Stanisław Bieniecki requested to merge sbstan/enable-highlighting-results into master
All threads resolved!

Type of change

  • Bug Fix
  • Feature

Changes related to the ADR: #128 (closed)

Does this introduce a change in the core logic?

  • [NO]

Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?

  • AWS
  • Azure
  • Google Cloud
  • IBM

Changes are for all provider however related code before and and after changes fully identical.

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • [NO] This feature had some different implementation before, but it was never enabled. Also it wasn't working correctly as it wasn't handling json paths so only top level field could be selected and there was no support for list fields.

What is the current behavior?

Currently there is no highlighting available for the users

What is the new/expected behavior?

Users can specify optional field highlightedFields which will add to each search result additional dictionary under key highlight with phrases from selected fields which matched the query. Example in the updated docs

Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?

Unit tests have been updated and some were added

Any other useful information

Edited by Mark Chance

Merge request reports

Merge request pipeline #208262 failed

Pipeline: Search

#208263

    Merge request pipeline failed for 944878bb

    Deployed to I‎BM‎ 1 year ago
    Deployed to A‎WS‎ 1 year ago
    Failed to deploy to Google‎_Cloud‎
    Approved by

    Merged by David DiederichDavid Diederich 1 year ago (Aug 31, 2023 6:05am UTC)

    Merge details

    Pipeline #209807 failed

    Pipeline failed for 1641017b on master

    Deployed to Google‎_Cloud‎ 1 year ago
    Deployed to A‎WS‎ 1 year ago
    Will deploy to I‎BM‎

    Activity

    Filter activity
    • Approvals
    • Assignees & reviewers
    • Comments (from bots)
    • Comments (from users)
    • Commits & branches
    • Edits
    • Labels
    • Lock status
    • Mentions
    • Merge request status
    • Tracking
  • Neelesh Thakur
  • added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • Mark Chance added 33 commits

    added 33 commits

    Compare with previous version

  • Mark Chance added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • add7091f - Update pom.xml - use 23.0-SNAPSHOT of oscorecommon

    Compare with previous version

  • Mark Chance resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Mark Chance requested review from @nthakur

    requested review from @nthakur

  • assigned to @sbstan

  • Mark Chance resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Mark Chance resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Mark Chance resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Mark Chance resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Mark Chance added 3 commits

    added 3 commits

    • add7091f...aa6694df - 2 commits from branch master
    • d715842c - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into sbstan/enable-highlighting-results

    Compare with previous version

  • Mark Chance added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 5253210b - Update pom.xml - fix oscorecommon reference

    Compare with previous version

  • Mark Chance added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 1eaa08d6 - Update pom.xml - fix oscorecommon reference

    Compare with previous version

  • added 1 commit

    Compare with previous version

  • Mark Chance added 1 commit

    added 1 commit

    • 944878bb - update core common reference to version 0.23.1

    Compare with previous version

  • Mark Chance resolved all threads

    resolved all threads

  • Please review -- all pipelines run as much as to be expected... CC @Rustam_Lotsmanenko @ydzeng @Srinivasan_Narayanan @nthakur

  • Srinivasan Narayanan approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • AWS Approved.

  • Rustam Lotsmanenko (EPAM) approved this merge request

    approved this merge request

  • I can't speak to the quality of the code, but the dependency changes look good. It's got three approvals, and the only failing CI job also fails on master. I think I'm going to hazard a merge on this one; I don't see it getting any more approved.

  • David Diederich mentioned in commit 1641017b

    mentioned in commit 1641017b

  • David Diederich mentioned in merge request !553 (merged)

    mentioned in merge request !553 (merged)

  • Please register or sign in to reply
    Loading