Gc perf

Type of change

• Bug Fix
• Feature

Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)

Does this introduce a change in the core logic?

• [YES/NO]

Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?

• AWS
• Azure
• Google Cloud
• IBM

Does this introduce a breaking change?

• [YES/NO]

What is the current behavior?

What is the new/expected behavior?

Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?

Any other useful information

provider/search-gc/src/main/java/org/opengroup/osdu/search/provider/gcp/cache/GcGroupCache.java

@@ -18,28 +18,36 @@
 package org.opengroup.osdu.search.provider.gcp.cache;
 
 import org.opengroup.osdu.core.common.cache.ICache;
+import org.opengroup.osdu.core.common.cache.VmCache;
 import org.opengroup.osdu.core.common.model.entitlements.Groups;
 
 // Group cache is used in common part. According to the current Google Cloud architecture, we don't
 // use cache. Thus, methods are empty.
 public class GcGroupCache implements ICache<String, Groups> {
+
+  private VmCache<String, Groups> cache;
+
+  public GcGroupCache() {
+    this.cache = new VmCache<>(60, 600);
+  }
+
   @Override
   public void put(String s, Groups o) {
-    // do nothing
+    cache.put(s, o);
   }
 
   @Override
   public Groups get(String s) {
-    return null;
+    return cache.get(s);
   }
 
   @Override
   public void delete(String s) {
-    // do nothing
+    cache.delete(s);
   }
 
   @Override
   public void clearAll() {
-    // do nothing
+    cache.clearAll();
   }
 }