Skip to content

Using Indexing Progress Topic

Komal Makkar requested to merge users/komakkar/indexingProgressTopic into master

All Submissions:

  • [YES] I have added an explanation of what changes in this merge do and why we should include it?
  • [YES] Does the MR contain pipeline/ helm chart related changes?
  • [YES] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • [NA] I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • [YES] All new and existing tests passed.
  • [YES] My code follows the code style of this project.
  • [YES] I ran lint checks locally prior to submission.

What is the issue or story related to the change?

High level design:

The topic where indexing progress was being published was records changed. These changes assume that indexing status was constructed for this purpose. Issue: storage issue

Change details:

Test coverage:

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • [YES/NO] No

Pending items

Reviewer request

  • Please provide an ETA when you plan to review this MR. Write a comment to decline or provide an ETA.
  • Block the MR if you feel there is less testing or no details in the MR
  • Please cover the following aspects in the MR -- Coding design: <Reviewer1> -- Backward Compatibility: <Reviewer2> -- Feature Logic: <Logic design> -- <Any other context mention here> OR -- <Component 1>: <Reviewer1> -- <CosmosDB>: <Reviewer2> -- <ServiceBus> <Reviewer3> -- <Mention any other component and owner>

Other information

Correlation id sent as komakar2 image

Indexing-progress has that as an active message with the same correlation-id image

Edited by Komal Makkar

Merge request reports