Skip to content

Draft: Added logic to fail application for multiple slf4j bindings

All Submissions:

  • [YES] I have added an explanation of what changes in this merge do and why we should include it?
  • [NA] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • [NA] I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • [YES] All new and existing tests passed.
  • [YES] My code follows the code style of this project.
  • [NA] I ran lint checks locally prior to submission.

What is the issue or story related to the change?

High level design: Added logic to start the application only if there are no multiple bindings for slf4j

Issue: If there are multiple bindings available for slf4j, then the binding with log4j2 breaks and consequently the integration with appinsights also breaks. Till date only a warning was being thrown in this scenario, and the application would run without logs going to appinsights. There is a need to fail the application if appinsights integration is broken in such a way.

Change details:

Test coverage:


Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • NO

Pending items


Reviewer request

  • Please provide an ETA when you plan to review this MR. Write a comment to decline or provide an ETA.
  • Block the MR if you feel there is less testing or no details in the MR
  • Please cover the following aspects in the MR -- Coding design: <Reviewer1> -- Backward Compatibility: <Reviewer2> -- Feature Logic: <Logic design> -- <Any other context mention here> OR -- <Component 1>: <Reviewer1> -- <CosmosDB>: <Reviewer2> -- <ServiceBus> <Reviewer3> -- <Mention any other component and owner>

Other information

Edited by Vibhuti Sharma [Microsoft]

Merge request reports