feat: nondefault datastore name
Type of change
-
Bug Fix -
Feature -
Pipeline -
Test -
Documentation
Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
-
No -
Yes
Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
-
AWS -
Anthos -
Azure -
GCP -
IBM
conventional commits spec?
Does this follow-
No -
Yes
Have you set the target Milestone?
-
No -
Yes
Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
-
No -
Yes
Updates description?
Now, we can work with non-default Datastores with using Partition service