Storage merge requestshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests2021-12-20T08:03:55Zhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/316Trusted istio fix2021-12-20T08:03:55ZAnkur RawatTrusted istio fixempty dns host name fixempty dns host name fixAnkur RawatAnkur Rawathttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/309added istion dns host2021-12-20T07:59:58ZAnkur Rawatadded istion dns hostFix for DnsHostName as empty string is not allowed.Fix for DnsHostName as empty string is not allowed.Ankur RawatAnkur Rawathttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/173Draft: Users/komakkar/corelib2021-11-19T11:58:57ZKomal MakkarDraft: Users/komakkar/corelib# Merge request template# Merge request templatehttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/65Updaing readme doc with Istio Auth filter2021-11-19T11:58:54ZKiran VeerapaneniUpdaing readme doc with Istio Auth filter# Merge request template# Merge request templatehttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/156Update blob write2021-11-19T11:58:50ZNicholas KarskyUpdate blob write## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [X] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provi...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [X] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [X] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [NO]
## What is the current behavior?
upload a blob record
## What is the new/expected behavior?
upload a blob record but slightly faster
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
N/A
## Any other useful information
Work related to increasing storage performance of Azure blob writeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/116Improve code coverage2021-11-19T11:58:30ZAalekh JainImprove code coverageImproving the code coverage of Storage Service. Adding UTs.Improving the code coverage of Storage Service. Adding UTs.https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/87adds redis cache for azure provider2021-11-19T11:58:19ZAliaksei Darafeyeuadds redis cache for azure provider## Type of change
- [X] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES]
## small refactoring: adds interface in core for existing cache GroupCache, LegalTagCache, SchemaCache.
- [X] AWS
- [X] Azure
- [X] GCP
- [X] IBM...## Type of change
- [X] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES]
## small refactoring: adds interface in core for existing cache GroupCache, LegalTagCache, SchemaCache.
- [X] AWS
- [X] Azure
- [X] GCP
- [X] IBM
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [X] Azure
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [NO]
## What is the new/expected behavior?
adds ability use redis or inMemory for azure providerNitin-slbDaniel SchollSherman YangPavel BachylaAlok JoshiDuvelis CaraoNitin-slbhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/190configuring rate limit filter2021-11-19T11:58:04ZSHEFFALI JAINconfiguring rate limit filter## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] YES
- [x] NO
## Does this introduce a change in the...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] YES
- [x] NO
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [x] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] YES
- [x] NO
## What is the current behavior?
Currently, no rate limiting is applied on service which can limit the count of users accessing it.
## What is the new/expected behavior?
The service will have specific token count which will set limit to restrict number of users using the service per cycle.
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
No.
## Any other useful information
Added Envoy filter to apply rate limiting. Added support to generate yaml file via Helm in deployment itself.
Initially value of applying rate limit filter is set to false.
It can be set while installing helm command using following instruction :
--set envoyFilter.enabled=trueSHEFFALI JAINSHEFFALI JAINhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/296pointing to cicd ibm-java-git.yml2021-11-03T10:59:49ZWalter Dpointing to cicd ibm-java-git.yml# Merge request template# Merge request templateWalter DWalter Dhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/294Draft: Fixing Integration Test for Entitlements V22021-11-02T12:25:29ZRonak SakhujaDraft: Fixing Integration Test for Entitlements V2# Merge request template
Fixing Integration Test for Entitlements V2# Merge request template
Fixing Integration Test for Entitlements V2https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/284update core common - Storage2021-10-20T07:22:59ZNikhil Singh[MicroSoft]update core common - Storage**Introduction**
This MR upgrades the os core-common version for azure provider to verify the recent security fixes made in the below mentioned MR are working properly.
**Issue Link**
https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/syst...**Introduction**
This MR upgrades the os core-common version for azure provider to verify the recent security fixes made in the below mentioned MR are working properly.
**Issue Link**
https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/lib/core/os-core-common/-/merge_requests/119Nikhil Singh[MicroSoft]Nikhil Singh[MicroSoft]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/283Draft: Update ref to test pipeline with common vars file [GONRG-3604]2021-10-13T11:38:23ZMikhail Piatliou (EPAM)Draft: Update ref to test pipeline with common vars file [GONRG-3604]# Merge request template# Merge request templateMikhail Piatliou (EPAM)Mikhail Piatliou (EPAM)https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/277Draft: health guidelines2021-10-11T10:43:49ZSmitha ManjunathDraft: health guidelines# Merge request template
Using the latest version of core-lib azure and enabling spring config to pick up common.properties file# Merge request template
Using the latest version of core-lib azure and enabling spring config to pick up common.properties fileSmitha ManjunathSmitha Manjunathhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/259Updating OSDU dependencies2021-09-03T10:30:55ZDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgUpdating OSDU dependenciesUpdating OSDU dependencies, to maintain use of the latest release among those that were previously doing soUpdating OSDU dependencies, to maintain use of the latest release among those that were previously doing soM8 - Release 0.11David Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orghttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/172Fix pod restarts on health check failues2021-08-30T21:34:36ZAlok JoshiFix pod restarts on health check failuesAfter pulling in this MR https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/149, we observed (in our internal ADO) that
- health check endpoint logs were missing from application insights and Log Analytics
- po...After pulling in this MR https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/149, we observed (in our internal ADO) that
- health check endpoint logs were missing from application insights and Log Analytics
- pods were not getting restarted when health checks were down
- [line51](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/blob/master/devops/azure/chart/templates/deployment.yaml) line 51 says have to upgrade to Spring Boot 2.3 but I believe we are on 2.1.18.RELEASE
- Falling back to actuator health check by `spring-boot-starter-actuator`
@krveduruAlok JoshiAlok Joshihttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/258Test2021-08-27T16:15:17ZAbhishek PatilTest# Merge request template# Merge request templateAbhishek PatilAbhishek Patilhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/255AWS Storage Fixes2021-08-26T18:34:06ZMatt WiseAWS Storage Fixes# Merge request template# Merge request templateMatt WiseMatt Wisehttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/250update azure-storage-blob as current version was disappeared from maven-central2021-08-18T13:49:59ZNeelesh Thakurupdate azure-storage-blob as current version was disappeared from maven-centralupdate com.azure:azure-storage-blob:jar:12.10.2 to match core-lib-azure. Maven-central has issue with current version 12.3.0 and it was pulled late last week.update com.azure:azure-storage-blob:jar:12.10.2 to match core-lib-azure. Maven-central has issue with current version 12.3.0 and it was pulled late last week.https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/232Added new version info endpoint (GONRG-2681)2021-08-13T12:20:37ZDmitrii Novikov (EPAM)Added new version info endpoint (GONRG-2681)## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/lib/core/os-core-common/-/issues/47
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES]
## Does this introduce a change in the ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/lib/core/os-core-common/-/issues/47
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [x] AWS
- [x] Azure
- [x] GCP
- [x] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES]
## What is the current behavior?
Provides info about maven build and gitM7 - Release 0.10Rostislav Dublin (EPAM)Rostislav Dublin (EPAM)https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/storage/-/merge_requests/212Add node selector2021-08-05T10:00:34ZDzmitry_Paulouski (slb)Add node selector## All Submissions:
-------------------------------------
* [YES] Have you followed our code review [guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/code-with-engineering-playbook/blob/master/pull-requests/code-reviews/readme.md)?
* [YES] Have ...## All Submissions:
-------------------------------------
* [YES] Have you followed our code review [guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/code-with-engineering-playbook/blob/master/pull-requests/code-reviews/readme.md)?
* [YES] Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
* [NO] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
* [NA] I have added tests to cover my changes.
* [YES] All new and existing tests passed.
* [YES] My code follows the code style of this project.
* [YES] I ran lint checks locally prior to submission.
## What is the current behavior?
-------------------------------------
Currently, we have only one node pool for services and system workloads.
## What is the new behavior?
-------------------------------------
We are going to move workloads to a new node pool with enabled autoscaling. Here you can find the details:
[Issue link](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/deployment-and-operations/infra-azure-provisioning/-/issues/167)
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
-------------------------------------
- [NO]
This change has a strong dependency on the following MR and should be merged **only** after it:
https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/deployment-and-operations/infra-azure-provisioning/-/merge_requests/324