Search merge requestshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests2021-10-21T07:52:56Zhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/173Update Core Common -Search2021-10-21T07:52:56ZNikhil Singh[MicroSoft]Update Core Common -Search**Introduction**
This MR upgrades the os core-common version for azure provider to verify the recent security fixes made in the below mentioned MR are working properly.
**Issue Link**
https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/syst...**Introduction**
This MR upgrades the os core-common version for azure provider to verify the recent security fixes made in the below mentioned MR are working properly.
**Issue Link**
https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/lib/core/os-core-common/-/merge_requests/119Nikhil Singh[MicroSoft]Nikhil Singh[MicroSoft]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/112Upgrade corelibazure dependencies2021-11-19T12:08:11ZSanjeev-SLBUpgrade corelibazure dependencieshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/102Draft: temp2021-11-19T12:08:18ZMANISH KUMARDraft: temphttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/83Elastic port fix for test cases2021-11-19T12:08:27ZMANISH KUMARElastic port fix for test cases## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [Yes]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud prov...## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [Yes]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [x] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [NO]
## What is the current behavior?
Breaking test cases for Azure
## What is the new/expected behavior?
Fix issue for Azure tests
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
NA
## Any other useful information
The changes of adding PORT as separate ENV variable is breaking test cases for backward compatibilityMANISH KUMARMANISH KUMARhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/36Updating readme doc with Istio Auth filter2021-11-19T12:08:28ZKiran VeerapaneniUpdating readme doc with Istio Auth filterhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/192Draft: updating version of log4j2021-12-11T10:44:44ZSmitha ManjunathDraft: updating version of log4jupdating version of log4jupdating version of log4jSmitha ManjunathSmitha Manjunathhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/52Added jacoco plugin for code coverage2021-12-16T16:22:54ZAalekh JainAdded jacoco plugin for code coverage## All Submissions:
-------------------------------------
* [YES] I have added an explanation of what changes in this merge do and why we should include it?
* [NO] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
* [NA] I have added tests t...## All Submissions:
-------------------------------------
* [YES] I have added an explanation of what changes in this merge do and why we should include it?
* [NO] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
* [NA] I have added tests to cover my changes.
* [YES] All new and existing tests passed.
* [YES] My code follows the code style of this project.
* [NO] I ran lint checks locally prior to submission.
## What is the current behavior?
-------------------------------------
No feature for generating code coverage reports in azure provider.
## What is the new behavior?
-------------------------------------
Added jacoco code coverage report generation for azure provider
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
-------------------------------------
- [NO]
-------------------------------------
Code coverage for Search azure -
![image](/uploads/9335702fd947fc7652946900e55d297c/image.png)https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/138Draft: Resolve "Use Stable Core Common Dependency"2022-01-11T13:24:17ZDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgDraft: Resolve "Use Stable Core Common Dependency"Closes #51
See osdu/platform&9 for more details.
## MR's Raison d'être
This MR updates the core common dependency to use the latest release candidate version of the library. This utilizes newly developed features, and will be upgrade...Closes #51
See osdu/platform&9 for more details.
## MR's Raison d'être
This MR updates the core common dependency to use the latest release candidate version of the library. This utilizes newly developed features, and will be upgraded to a full release during the new release cycle.
*Dependency Table, after the application of this MR's changes*
| Maven Dependencies | _Root POM_ | testing/integration-tests/ |
| ------------------------ | --------------- | -------------------------- |
| os-core-common | 0.10.0-rc1 | 0.10.0-rc1 |
| core-lib-gcp | 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT | |
| core.aws.os-core-lib-aws | 0.3.17 | 0.3.16 |
| core-lib-azure | 0.9.0 | 0.0.33 |
| os-core-lib-ibm | 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT | 0.0.18 |
## Housekeeping Updates
### FOSSA Update
This MR also updates the FOSSA attributions, since these need to be kept up to date on every MR. Changes are expected whenever the library dependencies are updated.
### Update Deprecated Pipeline Includes
This MR also updates the `.gitlab-ci.yml` file to use the newer pipeline includes, rather than relying on deprecated includes that mimic old behavior. These housekeeping updates should be done regularly on MRs when they are discovered so the old CI include files can be deleted and no longer supported.M7 - Release 0.10David Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orghttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/225Test ibm cicd2022-02-03T09:05:32ZNethi Saran KumarTest ibm cicdShrikant GargShrikant Garghttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/231Cherry-pick ' Upgrade dependencies' into 'release/0.13'2022-02-04T18:09:37ZDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgCherry-pick ' Upgrade dependencies' into 'release/0.13'Original MR: !222Original MR: !222M10 - Release 0.13David Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orghttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/190to search data across multiple kinds in one search2022-02-09T22:10:31ZZhibin Maito search data across multiple kinds in one searchIssue:[73](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/issues/73/)
This MR depends on MR [127](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/lib/core/os-core-common/-/merge_requests/127)
Using a snapsho...Issue:[73](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/issues/73/)
This MR depends on MR [127](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/lib/core/os-core-common/-/merge_requests/127)
Using a snapshot lib from MR MR [127](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/lib/core/os-core-common/-/merge_requests/127), we ran a test with simple query for "well" across 30 indices in one of the SLB env, the query is simple and the result is promising:
• Wildcard kind: -- took about 3.5 seconds
`{ "kind": "*:*:*:*", "limit": 25, "query": "well AND ((kind: \"opendes:welldb:wellbore2:1.0.0\") OR (kind: \"opendes:osdudemo:wellbore:1.0.0\") OR (kind: \"opendes:wks:polylineSet:1.0.0\") OR (kind: \"slb:wks:log:1.0.5\") OR ..." }`
• Multi-kinds: -- took about 0.624 seconds
`{ "kind": "opendes:welldb:wellbore2:1.0.0,opendes:osdudemo:wellbore:1.0.0,opendes:wks:polylineSet:1.0.0,slb:wks:log:1.0.5,opendes:osdu:wellbore-master:16.1.2,slb:wks:trajectory:1.0.5,...", "limit": 25, "query": "well" }`Zhibin MaiZhibin Maihttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/240Update application.properties2022-03-02T02:37:46ZSmitha ManjunathUpdate application.propertiesSmitha ManjunathSmitha Manjunathhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/161Updating core-lib-azure version2022-03-16T17:10:07ZAbhishek PatilUpdating core-lib-azure versionAbhishek PatilAbhishek Patilhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/166Draft: Smanjunath/resolve governance issues2022-03-16T17:10:12ZSmitha ManjunathDraft: Smanjunath/resolve governance issuesupdate dependenciesupdate dependenciesSmitha ManjunathSmitha Manjunathhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/245PBI-6584: Upgrade dependencies of springboot. os-common-core will have the la...2022-03-28T08:03:12ZHarsheet ShahPBI-6584: Upgrade dependencies of springboot. os-common-core will have the latest dependencies## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix - No
- [ ] Feature - No
Upgrade dependency of springboot. os-common-core will have the latest dependency of springboot.
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix - No
- [ ] Feature - No
Upgrade dependency of springboot. os-common-core will have the latest dependency of springboot.
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO] - NO
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS - NO
- [ ] Azure - NO
- [ ] GCP - NO
- [ ] IBM - NO
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO] - NO
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationHarsheet ShahHarsheet Shahhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/249Draft: Updating search service to use RedisAzureCache2022-03-28T09:13:34ZShiv SinghDraft: Updating search service to use RedisAzureCacheShiv SinghShiv Singhhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/256Upgrading the Core Lib Azure version for the Search Test module2022-04-05T10:39:08ZDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgUpgrading the Core Lib Azure version for the Search Test module```
Branch: dependency-upgrade-testing
SHA: c5f64aecb7eae4a0fa0756a61b4dea1f4df4b6ee
Maven: 0.15.0-SNAPSHOT
```
| Maven Dependencies | _Root_ | testing/integration-tests/ |
| ----------------------...```
Branch: dependency-upgrade-testing
SHA: c5f64aecb7eae4a0fa0756a61b4dea1f4df4b6ee
Maven: 0.15.0-SNAPSHOT
```
| Maven Dependencies | _Root_ | testing/integration-tests/ |
| ----------------------------------------------------- | ------ | -------------------------- |
| core-lib-azure | 0.14.0 | 0.14.0 |
| core-lib-gcp | 0.14.0 | |
| os-core-lib-aws | 0.14.0 | 0.3.16 |
| obm | 0.14.0 | |
| oqm | 0.14.0 | |
| os-core-common | 0.14.0 | 0.14.0 |
| os-core-lib-ibm | 0.14.0 | 0.0.18 |
| osm | 0.14.0 | |
| (3rd Party) net.minidev.json-smart | 2.4.7 | 2.4.7, 2.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-api | 2.17.1 | 2.11.1, 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-core | 2.17.1 | 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-jul | 2.17.1 | 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-slf4j-impl | 2.17.1 | 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-to-slf4j | 2.17.1 | 2.11.2 |David Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orghttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/258Draft: Azure/M8 to Master2022-04-06T12:39:12ZVibhuti Sharma [Microsoft]Draft: Azure/M8 to Master## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationVibhuti Sharma [Microsoft]Vibhuti Sharma [Microsoft]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/180Draft: Gonrg 30002022-04-18T13:57:31ZIgor Zimovets (EPAM)Draft: Gonrg 3000https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/162Add hpa config & memory limit setup using feature flag2022-04-18T13:57:32ZMina OtgonboldAdd hpa config & memory limit setup using feature flagAdd hpa config & memory limit setup using feature flagAdd hpa config & memory limit setup using feature flagM9 - Release 0.12Mina OtgonboldMina Otgonbold