Search merge requestshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests2023-01-09T14:49:22Zhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/413temporarily bypass maven dependency check2023-01-09T14:49:22ZMorris Estepatemporarily bypass maven dependency checkM16 - Release 0.19Morris EstepaMorris Estepahttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/412Gonrg 5894 gc rename2023-08-18T22:04:07ZAliaksandr Ramanovich (EPAM)Gonrg 5894 gc renameGONRG-5894 - google cloud rebrandingGONRG-5894 - google cloud rebrandingM16 - Release 0.19Aliaksandr Ramanovich (EPAM)Aliaksandr Ramanovich (EPAM)https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/411GONRG-6196: Remove variables that disable using policy2023-01-12T23:52:47ZVolodymyr Pienskoi [EPAM / GCP]GONRG-6196: Remove variables that disable using policyM16 - Release 0.19Volodymyr Pienskoi [EPAM / GCP]Volodymyr Pienskoi [EPAM / GCP]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/410Adding retry for socket timeout exception2023-01-02T14:47:43ZHarshika DhootAdding retry for socket timeout exception## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [x] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationHarshika DhootHarshika Dhoothttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/409Adding retry for socket timeout exception2023-01-02T14:47:53ZHarshika DhootAdding retry for socket timeout exception## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [x] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationHarshika DhootHarshika Dhoothttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/408[GONRG-6178] Decrease ISTIO requests and limits2023-01-12T23:53:22ZOleksandr Kosse (EPAM)[GONRG-6178] Decrease ISTIO requests and limitsDecrease ISTIO requests and limits for search serviceDecrease ISTIO requests and limits for search serviceM16 - Release 0.19https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/407Updated core lib for cors2022-12-29T06:06:06ZVineeth Guna [Microsoft]Updated core lib for cors## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/406Vulnerability fix ibm search service2023-02-16T13:37:44ZPintu GuptaVulnerability fix ibm search serviceFollowing CVE has been fix with this MR :
| cve | link |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| CVE-2022-25857 | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2...Following CVE has been fix with this MR :
| cve | link |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| CVE-2022-25857 | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25857 |
| CVE-2022-42003 | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42003 |
| CVE-2022-42004 | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42004 |
| CVE-2021-36090 | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-36090 |
| CVE-2022-42252 | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-42252 |Pintu GuptaPintu Guptahttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/405Update HTTPClient.java2022-12-21T12:29:55Zpreeti singh[Microsoft]Update HTTPClient.java## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationpreeti singh[Microsoft]preeti singh[Microsoft]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/404Update AzureHTTPClient.java2022-12-21T12:29:55Zpreeti singh[Microsoft]Update AzureHTTPClient.java## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationpreeti singh[Microsoft]preeti singh[Microsoft]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/403adding retry for jersey client for Azure ITs in case of 502 and 503.2023-02-01T06:34:51Zpreeti singh[Microsoft]adding retry for jersey client for Azure ITs in case of 502 and 503.This PR is to make our service ITs robust. We have observed lot of transient server errors like service unavailable and bad gw . We have added retries in those cases. The functionality doesn't change. The retries in case of transient err...This PR is to make our service ITs robust. We have observed lot of transient server errors like service unavailable and bad gw . We have added retries in those cases. The functionality doesn't change. The retries in case of transient errors and exceptions make it more resilient.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [x] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationM16 - Release 0.19preeti singh[Microsoft]preeti singh[Microsoft]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/402overriding client send method for azure2022-12-16T07:55:58Zpreeti singh[Microsoft]overriding client send method for azure## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationpreeti singh[Microsoft]preeti singh[Microsoft]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/401overriding send method2022-12-20T04:45:44Zpreeti singh[Microsoft]overriding send method## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationpreeti singh[Microsoft]preeti singh[Microsoft]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/400Connection to Redis must be protected by password(GONRG-6141)2022-12-21T16:16:09ZRustam Lotsmanenko (EPAM)rustam_lotsmanenko@epam.comConnection to Redis must be protected by password(GONRG-6141)## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provi...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [x] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [NO]
## What is the current behavior?
Redis connection service doesn't allow to use passwords in the GCP module.
## What is the new/expected behavior?
It is possible to configure redies clients with passwords.M16 - Release 0.19Riabokon Stanislav(EPAM)[GCP]Riabokon Stanislav(EPAM)[GCP]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/399upgrade dependencies and aws os core2022-12-29T09:27:06ZAbhay Joshiupgrade dependencies and aws os core## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
No
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
No
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [X ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationM16 - Release 0.19Okoun-Ola Fabien HouetoAbhay JoshiOkoun-Ola Fabien Houetohttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/398Update dependencies and aws core os2022-12-13T23:05:20ZAbhay JoshiUpdate dependencies and aws core os## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
No
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
No
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ X] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
No
## What is the current behavior?
N/A
## What is the new/expected behavior?
N/A
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
N/A
## Any other useful informationOkoun-Ola Fabien HouetoAbhay JoshiOkoun-Ola Fabien Houetohttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/397upgrade dependency and aws os core2022-12-13T22:53:34ZAbhay Joshiupgrade dependency and aws os core## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
NO
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
NO
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [X ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
NO
## What is the current behavior?
N/A
## What is the new/expected behavior?
N/A
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
No
## Any other useful information
Updated dependency and aws core versionOkoun-Ola Fabien HouetoAbhay JoshiOkoun-Ola Fabien Houetohttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/396Upgrade First Party Library Dependencies for Release 0.182022-12-13T12:22:04ZDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgUpgrade First Party Library Dependencies for Release 0.18This automated MR upgrades the first party libraries (other OSDU libraries) to utilize the latest release.
The intent is to keep the OSDU projects utilizing the latest available code to ensure widespread usage and stability.
However, any...This automated MR upgrades the first party libraries (other OSDU libraries) to utilize the latest release.
The intent is to keep the OSDU projects utilizing the latest available code to ensure widespread usage and stability.
However, any library that is older than the previous release will be left as-is, since the upgrade is likely to be more complicated.
Furthermore, the upgrade should only be merged in the CI pipeline reports success.
If this MR has failed, we can spend a little time investigating to see if a trivial upgrade could achieve compatiblity to the new library.
But significant upgrade efforts should not occur on this MR, as part of the release tagging process.
Instead, significant work should be scheduled for a subsequent milestone.
### Dependency Information Before the Upgrade
```
Branch: master
SHA: c02adb2357e6d8b4d57a9a7c8ce82c0218faffac
Maven: 0.19.0-SNAPSHOT
```
| Maven Dependencies | _Root_ | testing/integration-tests/ |
| ------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | -------------------------- |
| core-lib-azure | 0.17.0 | 0.13.0-rc6 |
| core-lib-gcp | 0.17.0 | |
| os-core-lib-aws | 0.15.0 | 0.14.0-rc2 |
| obm | 0.17.0 | |
| oqm | 0.17.0 | |
| os-core-common | 0.17.0 | 0.17.0 |
| os-core-lib-ibm | 0.16.0-rc1 | 0.15.2 |
| osm | 0.17.0 | |
| (3rd Party) com.fasterxml.jackson.core.jackson-databind | 2.13.2.2 | 2.13.2.2 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-api | 2.17.1 | 2.11.1, 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-core | 2.17.1 | 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-jul | 2.17.1 | 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-slf4j-impl | 2.17.1 | 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-to-slf4j | 2.17.1 | 2.11.2 |
| (3rd Party) org.springframework.spring-webflux | 5.3.22 | |
| (3rd Party) org.springframework.spring-webmvc | 5.3.22 | 5.3.22 |
### Dependency Information After the Upgrade
```
Branch: dependency-upgrade-2
SHA: d3ccd12845a75da40c2b8db747383fd4fcda92ac
Maven: 0.19.0-SNAPSHOT
```
| Maven Dependencies | _Root_ | testing/integration-tests/ |
| ------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | -------------------------- |
| core-lib-azure | 0.18.0 | 0.13.0-rc6 |
| core-lib-gcp | 0.18.0 | |
| os-core-lib-aws | 0.15.0 | 0.14.0-rc2 |
| obm | 0.18.0 | |
| oqm | 0.18.0 | |
| os-core-common | 0.18.0 | 0.18.0 |
| os-core-lib-ibm | 0.16.0-rc1 | 0.15.2 |
| osm | 0.18.0 | |
| (3rd Party) com.fasterxml.jackson.core.jackson-databind | 2.13.2.2 | 2.13.2.2 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-api | 2.17.1 | 2.11.1, 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-core | 2.17.1 | 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-jul | 2.17.1 | 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-slf4j-impl | 2.17.1 | 2.13.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-to-slf4j | 2.17.1 | 2.11.2 |
| (3rd Party) org.springframework.spring-webflux | 5.3.22 | |
| (3rd Party) org.springframework.spring-webmvc | 5.3.22 | 5.3.22 |M15 - Release 0.18https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/395Fixed vulnerabilities2022-12-13T11:10:11ZVineeth Guna [Microsoft]Fixed vulnerabilities## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] Google Cloud
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/merge_requests/394Cherry-pick 'parse-query changes' into release/0.182022-12-08T19:12:18ZChad LeongCherry-pick 'parse-query changes' into release/0.18**Original MR**: !372
### This MR is a Cherry Pick into a Release Branch.
After the release branch is first created, any subsequent changes use this process to update the release (often resulting in a new patch tag) without incorporati...**Original MR**: !372
### This MR is a Cherry Pick into a Release Branch.
After the release branch is first created, any subsequent changes use this process to update the release (often resulting in a new patch tag) without incorporating all changes in the default branch.
These MRs must be approved by the PMC before they are merged, since they alter the scope of the release.
To see more details about the change itself, look at the Original MR listed above.
#### Skipped Pipeline
Normally, pipelines are not executed on the cherry pick branch/MR prior to merging.
This optimization is accepted because the code was tested when it merged into the default branch, and will be tested again in the release branch prior to tagging.
However, if anybody feels that the MR requires further scrutiny -- whether because it had conflicts in the cherry-picking, it interfaces with some drastically altered logic between the branches, or any other reason -- we can run the pipeline here prior to merging.
#### If There's Reason to Run a Pipeline
If you want to see a pipeline result before this merges, first add a comment explaining why you'd like to see the pipeline results so the PMC and others know your thinking.
Then, mark the MR as a Draft MR (using the vertical ellipsis above, choose 'Mark as Draft').
This prevents the MR from being approved & merged accidentally by a busy release coordinator who didn't see your comment.
Finally, if you are a maintainer on the project, launch a pipeline on this branch.
Since this branch is a protected branch and the MR has ~no-detached-pipeline set, all integration tests will run and there's no need for any `trusted-*` branches.
[Launch a Pipeline for this Branch](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/search-service/-/pipelines/new?ref=cherry-pick-for-372)M15 - Release 0.18David Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.org