Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in / Register
  • Search Search
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Locked Files
  • Issues 28
    • Issues 28
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
    • Requirements
  • Merge requests 15
    • Merge requests 15
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test Cases
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Container Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Code review
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar

Upcoming Change to GitLab Pages The GitLab Pages URL is planned to migrate from the current *.pages.community.opengroup.org to a simpler domain: *.pages.opengroup.org. At the same time, HTTPS will be enabled for the server. This change is planned for May 21, 2022.

If you have questions or concerns, please email forum-support@opengroup.org.

  • Open Subsurface Data Universe Software
  • Platform
  • System
  • SearchSearch
  • Issues
  • #11

Closed
Open
Created Mar 23, 2020 by Ferris Argyle@fargyleMaintainer1 of 5 tasks completed1/5 tasks

Search - Map aggregate functionality (R2)

Status

  • Proposed
  • Trialing
  • Under review
  • Approved
  • Retired

Context & Scope

  • Displays wells on map to ensure return result is as soon as possible; restricts # of fields and wells. Allows returning wells based on searches of child data.
  • If query is geographic boundary and otherwise minimal, return all wells within that boundary: three fields (well name, unique id, …?)
  • This functionality is a popular request, but implemented as special case in the data platform; not clear whether it can be generalized - Alan

Decision

Retain map aggregate functionality through a more generalized mechanism than R1

  • Replace with injection of Elastic spatial filter

Rationale

Supports ISVs required functionality in a way that's not over-fitted for INT and SSIO

Consequences

INT and SSIO need to re-work R1 implementations.

Implementation Tasks:

  • Gap fit on this use case
  • Test according to the definition of done (Write test cases)
  • Add a user story to the project ADO

When to revisit


Tradeoff Analysis - Input to decision

Alternatives and implications

  • Retain R1 map aggregate functionality: no porting required, but overfits for INT and SSIO
  • Retain map aggregate functionality through a more generalized mechanism: supports ISVs required functionality in a way that's not over-fitted for INT and SSIO
  • Deprecate map aggregate functionality: simplifies OSDU but causes excessive burden on ISV client and networking

Decision criteria and tradeoffs

Decision timeline

Edited Mar 23, 2020 by Ferris Argyle
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking