Notification merge requestshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests2023-08-18T15:24:56Zhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/181Adding entries to requests table on notification processing2023-08-18T15:24:56ZSathyanarayanan SaravanamuthuAdding entries to requests table on notification processingAfter moving to SB based consumption, the entries were no more added to request table. This code change is to fill the request tables on processing the notifications.After moving to SB based consumption, the entries were no more added to request table. This code change is to fill the request tables on processing the notifications.M11 - Release 0.14Sathyanarayanan SaravanamuthuSathyanarayanan Saravanamuthuhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/186GONRG-4309: Cost optimization for service2023-08-18T15:24:54ZNastassia Rabeichykava (EPAM)GONRG-4309: Cost optimization for serviceM11 - Release 0.14Oleksandr Kosse (EPAM)Oleksandr Kosse (EPAM)https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/188upgrade core-lib version2022-02-22T12:56:27Zharshit aggarwalupgrade core-lib versionharshit aggarwalharshit aggarwalhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/189upgrade core lib azure version2023-08-18T15:24:53Zharshit aggarwalupgrade core lib azure versionM11 - Release 0.14harshit aggarwalharshit aggarwalhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/190update notification readme and core-common version2022-09-16T07:57:50ZAlok Joshiupdate notification readme and core-common versionPlease refer to this [ADR](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/home/-/issues/81). This is a corresponding documentation (and dependency upgrade) change in Notification service.Please refer to this [ADR](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/home/-/issues/81). This is a corresponding documentation (and dependency upgrade) change in Notification service.M11 - Release 0.14Alok JoshiAlok Joshihttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/191sensitive property look-up from env variables(GONRG-4404)2022-03-12T18:30:18ZRustam Lotsmanenko (EPAM)rustam_lotsmanenko@epam.comsensitive property look-up from env variables(GONRG-4404)# Merge reques## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [x...# Merge reques## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [x] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [NO]t templateM11 - Release 0.14Riabokon Stanislav(EPAM)[GCP]Riabokon Stanislav(EPAM)[GCP]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/194undertow vul fix2023-08-18T15:24:50ZGokul Nagareundertow vul fixM11 - Release 0.14Shrikant GargShrikant Garghttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/192Update DataNotification.md - added deletionType in delete event2022-09-16T07:49:20ZVaishali MangwaniUpdate DataNotification.md - added deletionType in delete event## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [X] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud prov...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [X] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [X] AWS
- [X] Azure
- [X] GCP
- [X] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [NO]
## What is the current behavior?
In deletion event type event type we get "op" : "delete"
## What is the new/expected behavior?
In deletion event type event type we will get additional attribute "deletionType" : "soft" or "deletionType" : "hard"
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
Yes
## Any other useful information
ADR Link - https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/home/-/issues/93M11 - Release 0.14https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/195Updated the error code for all the failed user dependency errors2023-08-18T15:24:48ZSanjeev-SLBUpdated the error code for all the failed user dependency errors## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud p...## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [X] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO] NO
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationM11 - Release 0.14Sanjeev-SLBSanjeev-SLBhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/197Merge branch 'ibm-undertow-vul-fix' into 'master'2022-03-24T13:11:19ZShrikant GargMerge branch 'ibm-undertow-vul-fix' into 'master'undertow vul fix
See merge request osdu/platform/system/notification!194
(cherry picked from commit 17103b251d8c8be8ee2426004b278e158db5682c)
6c28c0bf undertow vul fix
e737358d undertow vuln fixundertow vul fix
See merge request osdu/platform/system/notification!194
(cherry picked from commit 17103b251d8c8be8ee2426004b278e158db5682c)
6c28c0bf undertow vul fix
e737358d undertow vuln fixAnuj GuptaShrikant GargAnuj Guptahttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/198Fixed error exception2023-08-18T15:24:45ZSanjeev-SLBFixed error exception## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic? NO
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the clou...## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic? NO
- [YES/NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [x] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change? NO
- [YES/NO]
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationM11 - Release 0.14Sanjeev-SLBSanjeev-SLBhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/199fix readme, delete unwanted properties(GONRG-4634)2022-03-29T08:34:53ZRustam Lotsmanenko (EPAM)rustam_lotsmanenko@epam.comfix readme, delete unwanted properties(GONRG-4634)## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provi...## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [x] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [NO]M11 - Release 0.14Riabokon Stanislav(EPAM)[GCP]Riabokon Stanislav(EPAM)[GCP]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/196Azure | Increasing Code coverage2023-08-18T15:24:46ZSmitha ManjunathAzure | Increasing Code coverageM12 - Release 0.15Smitha ManjunathSmitha Manjunathhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/200Upgrade First Party Library Dependencies for Release 0.142022-03-29T17:08:07ZDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgUpgrade First Party Library Dependencies for Release 0.14This automated MR upgrades the first party libraries (other OSDU libraries) to utilize the latest release.
The intent is to keep the OSDU projects utilizing the latest available code to ensure widespread usage and stability.
However, any...This automated MR upgrades the first party libraries (other OSDU libraries) to utilize the latest release.
The intent is to keep the OSDU projects utilizing the latest available code to ensure widespread usage and stability.
However, any library that is older than the previous release will be left as-is, since the upgrade is likely to be more complicated.
Furthermore, the upgrade should only be merged in the CI pipeline reports success.
If this MR has failed, we can spend a little time investigating to see if a trivial upgrade could achieve compatiblity to the new library.
But significant upgrade efforts should not occur on this MR, as part of the release tagging process.
Instead, significant work should be scheduled for a subsequent milestone.
### Dependency Information Before the Upgrade
```
Branch: master
SHA: a5d3fdf7576f6b9e7d9f02790c154bf9edaf0fa4
Maven: 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT
```
| Maven Dependencies | _Root_ | testing/ |
| ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | -------------- |
| core-lib-azure | 0.14.0-rc2 | 0.0.22 |
| core-lib-gcp | 0.14.0-rc3, 0.11.0 | |
| core-test-lib-gcp | | 0.0.2 |
| os-core-lib-aws | 0.13.0 | 0.3.16 |
| obm | 0.13.1-SNAPSHOT | |
| oqm | 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT | |
| os-core-common | 0.14.0-rc3 | 0.3.4, 0.3.6 |
| os-core-lib-ibm | 0.13.0 | 0.13.0 |
| osm | 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT | |
| (3rd Party) net.minidev.json-smart | 2.4.7 | 2.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-api | 2.17.1 | 2.12.1, 2.11.1 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-core | 2.17.1 | 2.12.1 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-jul | 2.17.1 | 2.12.1 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-slf4j-impl | 2.17.1 | 2.12.1 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-to-slf4j | 2.17.1 | 2.11.2, 2.13.3 |
### Dependency Information After the Upgrade
```
Branch: dependency-upgrade
SHA: 99b2b2c60728614a9d4d4af103aa7fb6c0e384d7
Maven: 0.14.0-SNAPSHOT
```
| Maven Dependencies | _Root_ | testing/ |
| ----------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------- |
| core-lib-azure | 0.14.0 | 0.0.22 |
| core-lib-gcp | 0.14.0, 0.11.0 | |
| core-test-lib-gcp | | 0.0.2 |
| os-core-lib-aws | 0.14.0 | 0.3.16 |
| obm | 0.14.0 | |
| oqm | 0.14.0 | |
| os-core-common | 0.14.0 | 0.3.4, 0.3.6 |
| os-core-lib-ibm | 0.14.0 | 0.14.0 |
| osm | 0.14.0 | |
| (3rd Party) net.minidev.json-smart | 2.4.7 | 2.3 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-api | 2.17.1 | 2.12.1, 2.11.1 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-core | 2.17.1 | 2.12.1 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-jul | 2.17.1 | 2.12.1 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-slf4j-impl | 2.17.1 | 2.12.1 |
| (3rd Party) org.apache.logging.log4j.log4j-to-slf4j | 2.17.1 | 2.11.2, 2.13.3 |M11 - Release 0.14https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/202Removing deprecated pipeline includes2022-03-29T18:45:51ZDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgRemoving deprecated pipeline includesM11 - Release 0.14David Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orgDavid Diederichd.diederich@opengroup.orghttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/193[GONRG-4552] Refactor Helm for Onprem2023-08-18T15:24:51ZDanylo Vanin (EPAM)[GONRG-4552] Refactor Helm for Onprem## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [x] GCP
- [ ] IB...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [NO]
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [x] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [NO]M12 - Release 0.15Danylo Vanin (EPAM)Danylo Vanin (EPAM)https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/204Use worker logs from core-lib-azure2023-08-18T15:24:40ZVibhuti Sharma [Microsoft]Use worker logs from core-lib-azureExtend the AbstractMessageHandler class form core-lib-azure to utilize common worker logs.Extend the AbstractMessageHandler class form core-lib-azure to utilize common worker logs.M12 - Release 0.15Vibhuti Sharma [Microsoft]Vibhuti Sharma [Microsoft]https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/201Fixed exceptions2023-08-18T15:24:43ZSanjeev-SLBFixed exceptions## Type of change
- [X] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO] NO
## Does this introduce a change in the clou...## Type of change
- [X] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO] NO
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [X] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO] NO
## What is the current behavior?
## What is the new/expected behavior?
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
## Any other useful informationM12 - Release 0.15Sanjeev-SLBSanjeev-SLBhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/203Increase code coverage of Core module to 80%2023-08-18T15:24:41ZSmitha ManjunathIncrease code coverage of Core module to 80%## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [X] Code Enhancement
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/data-flow/ingestion/home/-/issues/51
## ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [X] Code Enhancement
**Please provide link to gitlab issue or ADR(Architecture Decision Record)**
https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/data-flow/ingestion/home/-/issues/51
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [YES/NO] No
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
Doesn't change any functionalities. Only increases code coverage.
## Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [YES/NO] NO
## What is the current behavior?
Code coverage was not tracked for core modules.
Coverage was a low 13%.
## What is the new/expected behavior?
Increased coverage to 80%.
## Have you added/updated Unit Tests and Integration Tests?
a few existing tests were modified. New classes are covered. Only unit tests impacted.
## Any other useful informationM12 - Release 0.15Smitha ManjunathSmitha Manjunathhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/system/notification/-/merge_requests/208[GONRG-4833] Refactor image name2023-08-18T15:24:37ZDanylo Vanin (EPAM)[GONRG-4833] Refactor image nameM12 - Release 0.15Danylo Vanin (EPAM)Danylo Vanin (EPAM)