seismic-dms-service merge requestshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests2023-11-29T14:03:13Zhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/1016Gonrg 6433 remove audiences2023-11-29T14:03:13ZSiarhei Poliak [EPAM / GCP]Gonrg 6433 remove audiences## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [-] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [-] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [-] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [-] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [-] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [-] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [-] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [-] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/1002Fix for vulnerabilities2024-01-03T09:26:55ZAbhishek PatilFix for vulnerabilities## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/998feat: use Azure storage queue for bulk-delete2023-11-17T07:31:08ZMaggie Salakfeat: use Azure storage queue for bulk-delete## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [x] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/990[For MSFT Team Review] Tests and fixes for filtering2023-11-13T09:19:30ZLaura Damian[For MSFT Team Review] Tests and fixes for filtering## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Updates description?
> This MR:
- adds more unit tests for filtering and refactors the code for listing datasets in a different class
- add...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Updates description?
> This MR:
- adds more unit tests for filtering and refactors the code for listing datasets in a different class
- adds end to end tests for filtering
- deletes the GET for dataset list and the parameters to be deprecated (as part of feedback on ADR: https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/issues/117)
- checks gtags and gtag parameters (these will be deprecated, but kept for legacy reasons)Laura DamianLaura Damianhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/989[Test Only] Check logs2023-11-07T14:08:08ZDiego Molteni[Test Only] Check logs## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/984[For MSFT Team Review]: Add `or` operator2023-11-09T09:59:40ZLaura Damian[For MSFT Team Review]: Add `or` operator[Internal PR, target branch is not `master`]
## Updates description?
> Support for 'not' operator
## How to test
Test with the http://localhost:5000/seistore-svc/api/v3/swagger-ui.html/#/Dataset/dataset-list-post.
The example body can ...[Internal PR, target branch is not `master`]
## Updates description?
> Support for 'not' operator
## How to test
Test with the http://localhost:5000/seistore-svc/api/v3/swagger-ui.html/#/Dataset/dataset-list-post.
The example body can be tweaked.
1. Make sure that there are datasets with name beginning with "W" that contain tagA or tagB or both are returned.
{
"search": "name=W%",
"select": "[name, path, created_by, gtags]",
"filter": {
"or": [{
"property": "gtags",
"operator": "CONTAINS",
"value": "tagA"
},
{
"property": "gtags",
"operator": "CONTAINS",
"value": "tagB"
}]
}
}
You can try other combinations.Laura DamianLaura Damianhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/983fix: update docker file to multistage docker build2023-11-02T21:37:13ZVaibhavi Kamanifix: update docker file to multistage docker build## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [x] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [x] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Adding Romica's [change](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/commit/68a4ce0e938770ad7914cd03cf963c080536c835) back from m16 branch to update docker file to multistage docker buildhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/980Draft: Azure SDMS stable2023-11-02T06:22:09ZSumra ZafarDraft: Azure SDMS stable## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/973[TEST] Msft/feat/e2e tests bulk deletion2023-10-31T09:10:41ZLaura Damian[TEST] Msft/feat/e2e tests bulk deletion## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/972[For MSFT Team Review] add "not" operator2023-11-01T12:09:31ZLaura Damian[For MSFT Team Review] add "not" operator[Internal PR, target branch is not `master`]
## Updates description?
> Support for 'not' operator
## How to test
Test with the http://localhost:5000/seistore-svc/api/v3/swagger-ui.html/#/Dataset/dataset-list-post.
The example body can ...[Internal PR, target branch is not `master`]
## Updates description?
> Support for 'not' operator
## How to test
Test with the http://localhost:5000/seistore-svc/api/v3/swagger-ui.html/#/Dataset/dataset-list-post.
The example body can be tweaked.
1. Make sure that there are datasets with name beginning with "W" tagA and these are not returned.
{
"search": "name=W%",
"select": "[name, path, created_by, gtags]",
"filter": {
"not": {
"property": "gtags",
"operator": "CONTAINS",
"value": "tagA"
}
}
}
2. Make sure that there are datasets with name benginning with "W" and the following tags:
[tagA], [tagB], [tagA, tagB], [tagB, tagC], tagB.
The following payload should return datasets that contain [tagB], tagB, and [tagB, tagC].
{
"search": "name=W%",
"select": "[name, path, created_by, gtags]",
"filter": {
"and": [
{
"property": "gtags",
"operator": "CONTAINS",
"value": "tagB"
},
{
"property": "name",
"operator": "LIKE",
"value": "W%"
},
{
"not": {
"property": "gtags",
"operator": "CONTAINS",
"value": "tagA"
}
}
]
}
}
Please be aware that using limit does not work with the Sidecar at the moment (this is tracked).https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/970Draft: Testing DO NOT MERGE2023-10-30T15:59:28ZSumra ZafarDraft: Testing DO NOT MERGE## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/966Draft: fix: remove the done callback from tests2023-10-26T22:38:34ZSumra ZafarDraft: fix: remove the done callback from tests## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/965Draft: test: checking2023-10-26T22:38:50ZSumra ZafarDraft: test: checking## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/964feat: [For MSFT Team Review]: bulk delete filters API2023-10-30T09:56:25ZAlexandre Gattikerfeat: [For MSFT Team Review]: bulk delete filters API[Internal PR, target branch is not `master`]
## Updates description?
Third part of the implementation of advanced filters for #117.
This PR includes:
- Advanced filters in Bulk Delete operation
Still missing, will be provided in fol...[Internal PR, target branch is not `master`]
## Updates description?
Third part of the implementation of advanced filters for #117.
This PR includes:
- Advanced filters in Bulk Delete operation
Still missing, will be provided in follow-up PRs:
- Support for `or` and `not` operators
## How to test
Run the application and the deletion sidecar locally (see PR 455 in MSFT internal repo for instructions on running the sidecar).
Use the Swagger UI to create datasets and delete them selectively using filters. Below is a sample end-to-end scenario.
### Create a first dataset
Use the `POST
/dataset/tenant/{tenantid}/subproject/{subprojectid}/dataset/{datasetid}` endpoint to create a dataset, with the following parameters:
```text
tenantId: read
subprojectId: subproject123
datasetId: bulkdeltest01
path: /bulkdeltest
```
and the following body:
```json
{
"gtags": [
"bulktesttag01"
]
}
```
Use the `PUT
/dataset/tenant/{tenantid}/subproject/{subprojectid}/dataset/{datasetid}/unlock` endpoint to remove the write lock, with the following parameters:
```text
tenantId: read
subprojectId: subproject123
datasetId: bulkdeltest01
path: /bulkdeltest
```
### Create a second dataset at the same path
Repeat the two operations above, replacing every occurrence of `01` with `02` (in `datasetId` and the tag name).
### List datasets
Use the `GET /dataset/tenant/{tenantid}/subproject/{subprojectid}` endpoint to list datasets, with the following parameters:
```text
select: [name]
tenantId: read
subprojectId: subproject123
```
Ensure that the `bulkdeltest01` and `bulkdeltest02` datasets are listed.
### Run bulk delete
Use the `PUT /operation/bulk-delete` operation, with the following parameter:
```text
path: sd://read/subproject123/bulkdeltest
```
and the following body:
```json
{
"filter": {
"and": [
{
"property": "gtags",
"operator": "CONTAINS",
"value": "bulktesttag01"
},
{
"property": "name",
"operator": "LIKE",
"value": "bulkdeltest%"
}
]
}
}
```
Check the console of the deletion sidecar for success messages.
### List datasets
Perform the call to the list datasets endpoint again. Ensure that only the `bulkdeltest02` dataset is listed.
### Cleanup
Use the bulk delete endpoint again, this time with `bulktesttag02` as tag filter value. Ensure that the list datasets endpoint does not show any datasets named `bulkdeltest*`.https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/961Draft: multistage docker build to address filemetadata vulnerabilities2023-10-30T16:01:58ZRomica JunejaDraft: multistage docker build to address filemetadata vulnerabilities## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changesRomica JunejaRomica Junejahttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/960Draft: filemetadata vulnerability fixes2023-10-30T16:01:29ZRomica JunejaDraft: filemetadata vulnerability fixes## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changesRomica JunejaRomica Junejahttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/957feat: [For MSFT Team Review]: query filters API2023-10-26T14:03:21ZAlexandre Gattikerfeat: [For MSFT Team Review]: query filters API[Internal PR, target branch is not `master`]
## Updates description?
Second part of the implementation of advanced filters for #117.
This PR includes:
- API layer accepting `filter` payload
- Transforming API input into query filter...[Internal PR, target branch is not `master`]
## Updates description?
Second part of the implementation of advanced filters for #117.
This PR includes:
- API layer accepting `filter` payload
- Transforming API input into query filter model
Still missing, will be provided in follow-up PRs:
- Support for `or` and `not` operators
- Advanced filters in Bulk Delete operation
This PR can be tested using the Swagger UI and the dataset list operation (adapting the filter from the provided example).https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/954fix: aws232023-10-18T18:29:34ZYunhua Koglinfix: aws23## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/945Cmongin/az14 test2023-10-16T23:48:05ZChristophe MonginCmongin/az14 test## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/938feat: update newman to 6.0.02023-10-13T09:39:43ZKonstantin Gukovfeat: update newman to 6.0.0## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Updates description?
This fixes local e2e tests with the newer node versions:
https://github.com/postmanlabs/newman/issues/3104