seismic-dms-service merge requestshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests2023-10-18T18:29:34Zhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/954fix: aws232023-10-18T18:29:34ZYunhua Koglinfix: aws23## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/945Cmongin/az14 test2023-10-16T23:48:05ZChristophe MonginCmongin/az14 test## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/938feat: update newman to 6.0.02023-10-13T09:39:43ZKonstantin Gukovfeat: update newman to 6.0.0## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Updates description?
This fixes local e2e tests with the newer node versions:
https://github.com/postmanlabs/newman/issues/3104https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/935Draft: Azure Storage Queue for the deletion jons2023-10-11T18:59:23ZKonstantin GukovDraft: Azure Storage Queue for the deletion jons## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/703Draft: Test pipeline for azure deploy2023-10-11T16:17:52ZMahsa HanifiDraft: Test pipeline for azure deploy## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [X] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GC...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [X] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [X] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/683Draft: Added concept to remove auth from the logs2023-10-11T16:17:46ZMahsa HanifiDraft: Added concept to remove auth from the logsRemoved an extra print statement and added a concept to remove the auth from the logs in the header sectionRemoved an extra print statement and added a concept to remove the auth from the logs in the header sectionMahsa HanifiMahsa Hanifihttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/692Draft: Added required changes to remove the bearer token from the logs2023-10-11T16:17:45ZMahsa HanifiDraft: Added required changes to remove the bearer token from the logs## Type of change
- [ *] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [X] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ *] Azure
- [ ] ...## Type of change
- [ *] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [X] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ *] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changesMahsa HanifiMahsa Hanifihttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/927Draft: chore: update package lock2023-10-05T21:28:37ZNathan StrelserDraft: chore: update package lock## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changesNathan StrelserNathan Strelserhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/914Draft: fix: remove other cloud provider dependencies for vulnerabilities2023-09-27T21:00:21ZNathan StrelserDraft: fix: remove other cloud provider dependencies for vulnerabilities## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changesNathan StrelserNathan Strelserhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/800polish code, fix vulnerabilities, update main README2023-09-14T06:40:04ZDiego Moltenipolish code, fix vulnerabilities, update main README## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
- [X] Code Style Review
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [X] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud prov...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
- [X] Code Style Review
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [X] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] Azure
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [X] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [X] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [X] Yes
## Updates description?
- Added code speller and fixed typos and spelling errors in code
- Reviewed linter an fixed lint issue in code
- Added pre commit hook to run code spell and lint
```bash
-------------------------------------------------------
1 - spelling errors check
-------------------------------------------------------
> sdms@4.0.0 spell
> cspell --no-progress .
CSpell: Files checked: 148, Issues found: 0 in 0 files
-------------------------------------------------------
2 - code linting
-------------------------------------------------------
> sdms@4.0.0 lint
> eslint --ignore-path .eslintignore --ext .js,.ts .
------------------------------------------------------
```
- Added missing headers info
- Upgraded dependencies to the latest version (fixed code vulnerabilities)
- @azure/core-rest-pipeline ^1.10.1 → ^1.11.0
- @azure/identity ^3.1.4 → ^3.2.3
- @types/express ^4.17.15 → ^4.17.17
- @types/node ^18.11.18 → ^20.4.1
- axios ^1.2.2 → ^1.4.0
- ioredis ^5.2.4 → ^5.3.2
- qs ^6.11.0 → ^6.11.2
- swagger-ui-express ^4.6.0 → ^5.0.0
- typescript ^4.9.4 → ^5.1.6
- Updated docker README
- Created main README
- Created cli README
- Reviewed cli generation scriptsM21 - Release 0.24Diego MolteniDiego Moltenihttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/897fix: code reviewed and added git pre-hook2023-09-13T16:20:18ZDiego Moltenifix: code reviewed and added git pre-hook## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changesM22 - Release 0.25Daniel PerezDaniel Perezhttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/885test: added e2e search and select2023-09-08T09:40:18ZPratiksha Shedgetest: added e2e search and select## Type of change
* [ ] Bug Fix
* [ ] Feature
* [ ] Pipeline
* [x] Test
* [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
* [x] No
* [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, i...## Type of change
* [ ] Bug Fix
* [ ] Feature
* [ ] Pipeline
* [x] Test
* [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
* [x] No
* [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
* [x] AWS
* [x] Anthos
* [x] Azure
* [ ] GCP
* [x] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
* [ ] No
* [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
* [ ] No
* [x] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
* [ ] No
* [x] Yes
## Updates description?
> Added End-to-End testing for search and select query for dataset list endpointM21 - Release 0.24https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/798Draft: Cosmos Configurable Backend - Not for Review2023-09-07T13:09:43ZChristopher LomonicoDraft: Cosmos Configurable Backend - Not for Review## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [x] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [x] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [x] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
This is a draft not meant to be merged for enabling configurating of the Azure Cosmos database settings when running testing/baselining actions to get metrics on performance.https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/872draft: healthchecks for the deletion service2023-09-06T15:31:35ZKonstantin Gukovdraft: healthchecks for the deletion service## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [x] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changes
Prepare to run the app on k8s:
- add a /healthz endpoint that checks the liveness of app dependencies
- expose the endpoint on a configurable porthttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/884Draft: feat: Bulk-deletion endpoints2023-09-05T07:17:10ZMaggie SalakDraft: feat: Bulk-deletion endpoints## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changeshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/857Add the locks2023-08-29T13:43:29ZLaura DamianAdd the lockshttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/809Draft: CosmosDB queries optimization [Not for review]2023-08-29T07:15:31ZIzabela KulakowskaDraft: CosmosDB queries optimization [Not for review]## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if ...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [x] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [x] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Updates description?
This PR contains changes of 2 CosmosDB queries:
1. Query to fetch the subfolders
- Fetch all distinct paths instead
- Perform string transformation in the code
- Use equality filters instead of RegexMatch
2. Query to fetch datasets
- Use equality filters instead of RegexMatch
- Please not this change is to present and test the approach, but it needs a proper, cleaner solution (currently it won't work for tenant containing '-')
The query execution performance improves significantly when these changes and custom indexes policy are applied on the CosmosDB container:
```json
{
"indexingMode": "consistent",
"automatic": true,
"includedPaths": [
{
"path": "/*"
}
],
"excludedPaths": [
{
"path": "/\"_etag\"/?"
},
{
"path": "/data/path/?"
}
],
"compositeIndexes": [
[
{
"path": "/data/tenant",
"order": "ascending"
},
{
"path": "/data/subproject",
"order": "ascending"
},
{
"path": "/data/path",
"order": "ascending"
}
]
]
}
```
Please note that this PR is for testing purposes, it presents the concept of a proposed approach but it's not a production code.Izabela KulakowskaIzabela Kulakowskahttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/877Draft: fix: revert the order of applying gtags filter2023-08-28T11:18:14ZIzabela KulakowskaDraft: fix: revert the order of applying gtags filter## Type of change
* [x] Bug Fix
* [ ] Feature
* [ ] Pipeline
* [ ] Test
* [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
* [x] No
* [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, i...## Type of change
* [x] Bug Fix
* [ ] Feature
* [ ] Pipeline
* [ ] Test
* [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
* [x] No
* [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
* [ ] AWS
* [ ] Anthos
* [ ] Azure
* [ ] GCP
* [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
* [ ] No
* [x] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
* [ ] No
* [ ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
* [ ] No
* [x] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changesIzabela KulakowskaIzabela Kulakowskahttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/575Draft: ci: release ibm helm 17 : IBM Helm Initial Merge to Master With Rel 17...2023-08-25T22:24:54ZManish SinghDraft: ci: release ibm helm 17 : IBM Helm Initial Merge to Master With Rel 17 codeIBM Helm Chart Initial MergeIBM Helm Chart Initial MergeM14 - Release 0.17Shrikant GargShrikant Garghttps://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/870cherry pick MR 861 to m16 master branch2023-08-24T16:18:02Zshivani karipecherry pick MR 861 to m16 master branch## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ * ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ * ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation,...## Type of change
- [ ] Bug Fix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Pipeline
- [ * ] Test
- [ ] Documentation
## Does this introduce a change in the core logic?
- [ * ] No
- [ ] Yes
## Does this introduce a change in the cloud provider implementation, if so which cloud?
- [ ] AWS
- [ ] Anthos
- [ * ] Azure
- [ ] GCP
- [ ] IBM
## Does this follow [conventional commits spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#summary)?
- [ ] No
- [ * ] Yes
## Have you set the target Milestone?
- [ ] No
- [ * ] Yes
## Have you set the no-detached-pipeline label?
- [ ] No
- [ * ] Yes
## Updates description?
> Update this part with a description of your changes
- This merge request addresses the problem of failing unit tests in the file metadata.
- It adjusts the "allow failure" setting to false, enhancing performance and preparing for potential challenges if the pipeline fails in the future.
parent MR link: [861](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/seismic/seismic-dms-suite/seismic-store-service/-/merge_requests/861)shivani karipeshivani karipe