home.md

@@ -354,18 +354,18 @@ For reference, the following are the original, temporary, Fluid Model-related cu
 
 ### 11. Are all the content schemas equally mature (Feb. 2025, M25)?
 
-No, as of Feb. 2025, not all content schemas are equally mature. Those deemed "high priority" (18x) by multiple companies are classified as **"mature"**. These have undergone maturing which includes: 
+No, as of Feb. 2025, not all content schemas are equally mature. Those deemed "high priority" (18x) by multiple companies are classified as **"Mature"**. These have undergone maturing which includes:
 
 * multi-company review
 * addition of detailed attribute descriptions
 * creation and refinement of "MECE" reference list values with complete and precise attribute descriptions
 
-Remaining content schemas (\~26x) are usable, but have not undergone this same level of review. Nonetheless multiple companies represented in RAFS Data Definitions, along with the PMC, have decided to release these with a status of **"pending-review"** for the following reasons:
+Remaining content schemas (\~26x) are usable, but have not undergone this same level of review. Nonetheless multiple companies represented in RAFS Data Definitions, along with the PMC, have decided to release these with a status of **"Pending Review"** for the following reasons:
 
 * they can be adopted today, with adopters knowing that in the future data migration to more mature schemas may be necessary
 * they can be tested today, with SMEs, data engineers, and data managers reviewing them in order to understand any needed enhancements, which will accelerate their move to "mature" via feedback
 
-**The status of "mature" versus "pending-review" for each schema is communicated in at least two ways:**
+**The status of "Mature" versus "Pending Review" for each schema is communicated in at least two ways:**
 
 * In the Supported Data Types wiki page
 * In the schemas themselves under the attribute called `x-osdu-review-status`
\ No newline at end of file