@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ No, as of Feb. 2025, not all content schemas are equally mature. Those deemed "h
* multi-company review
* addition of detailed attribute descriptions
* creation and refinement of "MECE" reference list values with complete and precise attribute descriptions
* creation and refinement of mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive (MECE) reference list values with complete and precise attribute descriptions
Remaining content schemas (\~26x) are usable, but have not undergone this same level of review. Nonetheless multiple companies represented in RAFS Data Definitions, along with the PMC, have decided to release these with a status of **"Pending Review"** for the following reasons:
...
...
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ Note that in some previous experimental versions of the RAFS DDMS, this DDMS too
Preparing for graduation, the RAFS DDMS team kept the "samplesanalysis" v2 endpoint unchanged (as stable as possible). However, we added capabilities under the "dev" version since the M24 release, to add new functionality for visibility into potential new capabilities, opening the opportunity for testing, feedback, and refinement.
The RAFS DDMS team considers the "dev" endpoint in the "alpha" testing phase.
ME
* The ["dev" endpoint is documented here](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/rock-and-fluid-sample/rafs-ddms-services/-/tree/main/docs/dev), along with its filtering capabilities.
* The ["v2" endpoint is documented in the tutorial here](https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/platform/domain-data-mgmt-services/rock-and-fluid-sample/rafs-ddms-services/-/tree/main/docs/dev?ref_type=heads#available-metadata-fields), along with its filtering capabilities.