Changes

Page history
Update Comparing OSDU & OpenDES Schema Semantics authored by Alex Narayanan's avatar Alex Narayanan
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
OSDU-(C)/Design-and-Implementation/Entity-and-Schemas/Comparing-OSDU-&-OpenDES-Schema-Semantics.md
View page @ 6c48ba76
......@@ -12,11 +12,12 @@ This page & the recommendations are collectively authored by the following membe
* Thomas Gehrmann (SLB)
* Vincent J Kowalski (Shell)
> *Update*
> The proposals were subcommittee to the core members of EA subcommittee in December. And the following proposals were revised for more examples and descriptions. A quick summary is as below:
> * Kind vs. Master Data, Reference Data, Work Product & Work Product Components - Added more examples, linked the page that captures the EA notes
> *Update on 13-JAN-2020*
> The proposals were submitted & reviewed by core members of EA subcommittee in December 2019. The original proposals have remained more or less unchanged. The summary can be found [here].(https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/documentation/-/wikis/Resolutions-for-GroupType,-WorkProduct-and-Kind-identity-discussions)
> Subsequently this page is updated to reflect those additional recommendations.
>
> * Kind vs. Master Data, Reference Data, Work Product & Work Product Components - Added more examples, linked the page that captures the EA notes.
>
> * Handling Identifiers - updated rational to link the parent page.
......@@ -54,10 +55,6 @@ Each of these same concepts follow a "ResourceTypeID" to identify its type. The
## Proposal
Below is the illustration of the current OSDU model merging into the combined model
![image](uploads/2a2832405d546249188e749948c18f5b/image.png)
We propose that the following model that emulates the best of OSDU & ODES
|OSDU| ODES | Proposal| Comments |
......@@ -68,9 +65,14 @@ We propose that the following model that emulates the best of OSDU & ODES
|IndividualType|EntityType| Type| -- | Well, Log, Seismic3D etc. |
|Version [0-9]+| Version (Semantic Version - n.n.n)|Version (Semantic Version - n.n.n)| Adapt semantic version |
You'll notice that GroupType is retained and carried forward from OSDU.
Below is the illustration of the current OSDU model merging into the combined model
![image](uploads/2a2832405d546249188e749948c18f5b/image.png)
Below are some of the examples on how the Kind would look across different domains.
*Work Products named Project and Study*
......
......