Changes

Page history
Update Comparing OSDU & OpenDES Schema Semantics authored by Alex Narayanan's avatar Alex Narayanan
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
OSDU-(C)/Design-and-Implementation/Entity-and-Schemas/Comparing-OSDU-&-OpenDES-Schema-Semantics.md
View page @ 6c48ba76
...@@ -12,11 +12,12 @@ This page & the recommendations are collectively authored by the following membe ...@@ -12,11 +12,12 @@ This page & the recommendations are collectively authored by the following membe
* Thomas Gehrmann (SLB) * Thomas Gehrmann (SLB)
* Vincent J Kowalski (Shell) * Vincent J Kowalski (Shell)
> *Update* > *Update on 13-JAN-2020*
> The proposals were subcommittee to the core members of EA subcommittee in December. And the following proposals were revised for more examples and descriptions. A quick summary is as below: > The proposals were submitted & reviewed by core members of EA subcommittee in December 2019. The original proposals have remained more or less unchanged. The summary can be found [here].(https://community.opengroup.org/osdu/documentation/-/wikis/Resolutions-for-GroupType,-WorkProduct-and-Kind-identity-discussions)
> Subsequently this page is updated to reflect those additional recommendations.
> * Kind vs. Master Data, Reference Data, Work Product & Work Product Components - Added more examples, linked the page that captures the EA notes >
> * Kind vs. Master Data, Reference Data, Work Product & Work Product Components - Added more examples, linked the page that captures the EA notes.
>
> * Handling Identifiers - updated rational to link the parent page. > * Handling Identifiers - updated rational to link the parent page.
...@@ -54,10 +55,6 @@ Each of these same concepts follow a "ResourceTypeID" to identify its type. The ...@@ -54,10 +55,6 @@ Each of these same concepts follow a "ResourceTypeID" to identify its type. The
## Proposal ## Proposal
Below is the illustration of the current OSDU model merging into the combined model
![image](uploads/2a2832405d546249188e749948c18f5b/image.png)
We propose that the following model that emulates the best of OSDU & ODES We propose that the following model that emulates the best of OSDU & ODES
|OSDU| ODES | Proposal| Comments | |OSDU| ODES | Proposal| Comments |
...@@ -68,9 +65,14 @@ We propose that the following model that emulates the best of OSDU & ODES ...@@ -68,9 +65,14 @@ We propose that the following model that emulates the best of OSDU & ODES
|IndividualType|EntityType| Type| -- | Well, Log, Seismic3D etc. | |IndividualType|EntityType| Type| -- | Well, Log, Seismic3D etc. |
|Version [0-9]+| Version (Semantic Version - n.n.n)|Version (Semantic Version - n.n.n)| Adapt semantic version | |Version [0-9]+| Version (Semantic Version - n.n.n)|Version (Semantic Version - n.n.n)| Adapt semantic version |
You'll notice that GroupType is retained and carried forward from OSDU. You'll notice that GroupType is retained and carried forward from OSDU.
Below is the illustration of the current OSDU model merging into the combined model
![image](uploads/2a2832405d546249188e749948c18f5b/image.png)
Below are some of the examples on how the Kind would look across different domains. Below are some of the examples on how the Kind would look across different domains.
*Work Products named Project and Study* *Work Products named Project and Study*
... ...
......